Google’s Gemini AI has come under criticism for its complex naming conventions and overwhelming options. As OpenAI simplifies its ChatGPT product by adopting a straightforward naming system, many are urging Google to follow suit.
Currently, Gemini offers users access to multiple language models, but the similar names create confusion. Users face a choice among seven models, which can be cumbersome for those simply seeking assistance with basic tasks.
In contrast, OpenAI’s approach allows the AI to select the appropriate model based on the complexity of user queries. This method reduces the burden on users to choose from a plethora of options.
Observers suggest that Google could streamline its offerings by adopting clearer naming conventions. For instance, instead of lengthy and convoluted names like ‚Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental with apps,‘ a simpler ‚Gemini 2.0‘ could suffice.
As the AI landscape evolves, the emphasis on user experience is becoming increasingly important. Simplifying product names and options could enhance accessibility and usability for a broader audience.
For more details, visit the original article on TechRadar.